Title: RE: [ebxml-iic] [Fwd: Durand 8/19/2004: Testing isIntelligibleCheckRequired]
Thanks Monica... forgot to send this out.
But what do you mean here:
>...only if the message (not the business document) passes structured or schema validation.
The bus doc may of course be other than XML, but it seems important that a Receipt
also covers the validation of the business doc, if one wants it to mean more than say an RM Ack... - or at least, shouldn't BPSS be more explicit about distinguishing when
schema validation can be done for message headers/envelope, vs for bus payload too?
(the Receipt could then have a very different meaning in each case!)
Jacques
-----Original Message-----
From: Monica J. Martin [mailto:]
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 6:55 PM
To: ebXML IIC - main list (E-mail) (E-mail)
Subject: [ebxml-iic] [Fwd: Durand 8/19/2004: Testing
isIntelligibleCheckRequired]
I provided this to Jacques late last week and it triggered more
investigation on my part (and the ebBP TC) because some of the technical
specification language was not as clear as it could have been. See this
thread from today regarding this attribute (which basically is an
additional syntactic check on message, business document and document
envelope):
http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/ebxml-bp/200408/msg00046.html. Thanks.
>mm1: I did some research and here is the conditions that help understand the testing requirements:
>
>If isIntelligibleCheckRequired = 'true', Receipt Acknowledgment can only if the message (not the business document) passes structured or schema validation. We currently have a bit of a conflict in the descriptions in the document [1]. Thanks.
>
>Note, can you please send to the list as I am having email message sending issues?
>
>[1] I'll address this one.
>
>
To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ebxml-iic/members/leave_workgroup.php.
