← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

WD 25 comments

From
Pim van der Eijk <>
Date
2007-06-21T12:07:42+00:00
ID
001701c7b3fc$bfc04d90$e600a8c0@VaioSX
Thread
WD 25 comments
Line 289:
"The ebMS V3 specification is divided into two parts described in two
different documents."
Reference to second part, which does not (yet) exist.

Line 988:
"in whcih" --> "in which"

Line 1174:
". Default P-Mode.MEP: One-Way/Push."
. Default P-Mode.MEPbinding: One-Way/Push."

Should this be (per D.3.1) something like:
". Default P-Mode.MEP:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ebxml-msg/ebms/v3.0/ns/core/200704/oneWay"
. Default P-Mode.MEPbinding:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ebxml-msg/ebms/v3.0/ns/core/200704/push" ?
or
". Default P-Mode.MEP: One-Way"
. Default P-Mode.MEPbinding: Push" ?

Line 1606:
To be consistent with the PartyId appendix from the CPA spec, should this
change this from:
"<eb:PartyId type="urn:duns">123456789</eb:PartyId>"
To:
"<eb:PartyId
type="urn:oasis:names:tc:ebxml-cppa:partyid-type:duns">123456789</eb:PartyId
>"

Line 2191:
"messageId of the message"
-->
"MessageId of the message"
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →