+1
Martin W Sachs wrote:
>
> In my opinion it makes more sense for Service to point to the PIP ID and
> action to point to the particular business transaction within the PIP. In
> other words one execution of a PIP is a conversation. I believe that some
> of the PIPs include multiple business transactions.
>
> Regards,
> Marty
>
> *************************************************************************************
>
> Martin W. Sachs
> IBM T. J. Watson Research Center
> P. O. B. 704
> Yorktown Hts, NY 10598
> 914-784-7287; IBM tie line 863-7287
> Notes address: Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM
> Internet address: mwsachs @ us.ibm.com
> *************************************************************************************
>
> David Fischer <> on 07/19/2001 10:45:54 AM
>
> To: "Burdett, David" <>
> cc: ebXML Msg <>
> Subject: PIP IDs
>
> David, in the F2F you mentioned the need for a new element to contain
> industry specific business process identifiers such as a RosettaNet PIP
> identifier. Could this be done with Service/Action where the Service would
> be something like RNet and the Action something like PIP3A1 (Request
> Quote)?
>
> <eb:Service>urn:services:RNet</eb:Service>
> <eb:Action>PIP3A1</eb:Action>
>
> Regards,
>
> David Fischer
> Drummond Group.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
> "unsubscribe" in the body to:
