Next in thread → Next in month →

RE: FW: T2,Proposed solution for ... Re: SyncReplyandReliableMessagingMethod inQualityOfServiceInfo

From
System
Date
2001-09-24T12:05:00+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: FW: T2,Proposed solution for ... Re: SyncReplyandReliableMessagingMethod inQualityOfServiceInfo
We tried to make it pretty clear that a delivery channel can be specified
separately for each and every business transaction if necessary.  We also
made it clear that there is no way in any of these specifications to
specify a separate delivery channel for each instance of a message.  One
exception, it is permissible for a request message to specify the endpoint
address to be used for the response and that would override whatever
endpoint address the CPA defines for that business transaction.

*************************************************************************************

Martin W. Sachs
IBM T. J. Watson Research Center
P. O. B. 704
Yorktown
Hts, NY 10598
914-784-7287;  IBM tie line 863-7287
Notes address:  Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM
Internet address:  mwsachs @ us.ibm.com
*************************************************************************************

David Fischer <> on 09/21/2001 07:14:14 PM
To:
Dale Moberg <>, Dan Weinreb

<>
cc:
, 
Subject:  RE: FW: T2, Proposed solution for ... Re:

SyncReplyandReliableMessagingMethod in QualityOfServiceInfo

Dale,

OK.  This is encouraging . . .  The reason this question came up before is
there
is no way to specify which DeliveryChannel within the CPA to use?  We need
to
transmit this information from the From Party to the To Party.  How?  Do we
need
to add a DeliveryChannel attribute onto the CPAId?  Is there some other
way?

Regards,

David Fischer
Drummond Group
Next in thread → Next in month →