Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2001 16:02:38 -0500
From: "Martin W Sachs" <>
OK, that's fine with me, as long as we make it very clear to our
readership that a PartyId, *despite its name*, does not uniquely
identify a "party". Is that right?
MWS: Let's try this: An enterprise may own one or more PartyIds. A given
PartyId belongs to only one enterprise. In that sense, it is unique.
That's fine, as far as the relationship between "enterprise" and
"PartyId" goes. But I also think we have to state that the
relationship between "PartyId" and "party" is *not* that a PartyId
identifies a party, as one might otherwise presume from the name.
-- Dan
