+1
Martin W Sachs wrote:
> Yes, this is the real world and businesses that don't follow the spec are
> creating a serious interoperability exposure for themselves. Nonetheless,
> if a message violates the intent of the creaters of the CPA (or equivalent)
> one or the other has made a serious error and processing of the message
> should not continue.
>
> Regards,
> Marty
>
> *************************************************************************************
>
> Martin W. Sachs
> IBM T. J. Watson Research Center
> P. O. B. 704
> Yorktown Hts, NY 10598
> 914-784-7287; IBM tie line 863-7287
> Notes address: Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM
> Internet address: mwsachs @ us.ibm.com
> *************************************************************************************
>
>
>
> David Fischer <> on 11/08/2001 10:19:07 PM
>
> To: Dan Weinreb <>,
> cc: Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM@IBMUS,
> Subject: RE: [ebxml-msg] Question about OPTIONAL
>
>
>
> I find myself outnumbered so I will acquiesce -- with one final comment.
>
> Businesses in the real world don't like strict rules. I think this will
> fail,
> or more likely implementors will not follow the spec.
>
> - David
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Weinreb [mailto:]
> Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 9:07 PM
> To:
> Cc: ; ;
>
> Subject: Re: [ebxml-msg] Question about OPTIONAL
>
>
> Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2001 11:07:47 -0800
> From: Arvola Chan <>
>
> I vote for option 1: Stop processing and send back an Error --
> NotSupported/Error.
>
> I agree, and with the rest of what you said.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
>
