[ebxml-msg] Edit Items.

We already 
voted NOT to do this kind of editorial round again.  

 

Excerpt 
from Conference Call 1-22-02

 

    Motion:  Following the validation of the 
specifications, if any clarifications 
to the

    specification are 
required, we will ballot that 
specification for consideration for

    submission prior 
to submitting to OASIS. – Bob, 
second: David F.

Question:  What do we mean by freezing technical 
changes?  (Doug)  Changing PositiveInteger to 
nonNegativeInteger is correcting 

an inconsistency not a 
technical change.

 

Friendly Amendment:  Voting would be to consider any errata 

from items received or 
implementation experience before it is 

submitted to the OASIS 
membership.  These will be voted on 
as a new TC specification. – Chris. 
 Bob did not accept.

 

Comment:  We need a Change Control Officer for the 
next 6 weeks – Ian. (Doug agree).

 

Ian – any objections (no) 
motion passes.

 

Most of 
the items marked as Disagree are to comply with the vote cited above.  
These items are 
not *correcting an inconsistency* nor *required clarifications*.  
We can deal with this kind of thing in v3.0.  

 

I would 
like to withdraw my submission titled ebMS_v2_0revA.pdf.  Ian, please do 
not post to the web site.

 

Regards,

 

David 
Fischer

Drummond 
Group.