Re: [ebxml-msg] Time Frame for adoption of Specifications

Lisa,

Version 2.0 of the specification was just approved by the
OASIS ebXML Messaging TC.

If you scour the  you'll find
that a number of vendors have recently disclosed support
in their respective products for implementations of the
v2.0 specification.

Cheers,

Chris

Seaburg, Lisa wrote:

> I work with several vertical industry groups.  I have had these 
> questions come up over and over again, will someone please help me out 
> here.  I have agreed to go looking for answers.
> 
> The ebXML Message 1.0 did not give these companies what they wanted in 
> their TRP, so they are looking toward version 2.0 of this 
> specification.  They would like to know: 
> 
>         When will this draft specification become a usable technical 
> specification?
> 
>         Once it is, when will in be available within tools to use?
> 
>         Why should they chose this over what is already out there and 
> already working?
> 
>         Who has implemented this into their product, and has it working?
> 
> 
> All good questions, but hard to answer.  Each company has their own 
> agenda for their work, and each company will decide on what to use 
> moving forward.  If their industry is already using RosettaNet RNIF and 
> other standards that have been around awhile.  They need to find good 
> reason to make their move away from those.  Thanks.
> 
> Lisa
> 
> Lisa Seaburg
> Vertical Industries Evangelist
> Commerce One Labs
> Commerce One, Inc.
> 19191 Vallco Parkway, Cupertino, CA
> Phone: 662-560-6397
> Mobile: 662-501-7676
> http://www.xcbl.org/
> and
> http://www.commerceone.com/
> 
>