Martin W Sachs wrote:
> I believe that the "short delay" will be sufficient to pull the spec out of
> the current approval cycle and move it to the next quarter.
Yes, the late arrival of the IPR is the root cause of the problem for the ebXML framework.
But its significatly easier to remove costs before they occur and its easier to reduce risk of doing
business before the risk becomes a factor. The macro economic cost of making a short delay most
certainly outweights the costs of due to risk of doing business related to the global community of
SME vendors and their customers.
I believe that David Fischer may have come up with a solution that uses errata to remove any trace
of CPPA requirements without delaying the spec.
/anders
--
/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
/ Anders W. Tell , Financial Toolsmiths AB /
/ <>,<www.toolsmiths.se> /
/ Open ebXML Laboratory: <www.openebxmllab.org> /
/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
