Next in thread → Next in month →

Re: [ebxml-msg] Short proposal

From
System
Date
2003-02-20T11:52:00+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [ebxml-msg] Short proposal
MHonArc v2.5.2 -->


















ebxml-msg message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [Elist Home]








Subject: Re: [ebxml-msg] Short proposal




From: Matthew MacKenzie <>
To: Doug Bunting <>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 08:51:43 -0800






Attached is an updated copy of the proposal.

-Matt

Doug Bunting wrote:

> Matt,
>
> Your use cases sound to me like they need two default CPA documents or 
> descriptions rather than one.  At one level, the Messaging TC would 
> need to describe / define the environment in which the Interrogation 
> Service runs.  At another, the service (MSH) receiving an 
> Interrogation Request must have an appropriate Interrogation Response 
> available, meaning it must have the default CPA (where you've focused 
> this proposal).  Getting both levels nailed down may be slightly less 
> straightforward than your proposal implies.
>
> I'd guess deciding the parameter set for executing an anonymous 
> Interrogation Request will form the bulk of the development work for 
> our TC.  The actual Interrogation Request / Response would likely be 
> relatively simple.
>
> Small point: My preference would be for the receiving service, using 
> information available in the Request, to respond with a fully 
> qualified CPA rather than having us attempt description of "something 
> (random) between a CPP and a CPA".  The Request shouldn't be anonymous 
> but "merely" be un-authenticated.
>
> thanx,
>     doug
>
> --On Wednesday, 19 February 2003 15:20 -0800 Matthew MacKenzie 
> <> wrote:
>
> > Team,
> >
> > Attached is a short proposal I just wrote describing in a little more
> > detail the idea I brought forward in the conference call today.
> > Basically, I'm proposing a new service which will return to the 
> requestor
> > the "default CPA".  I'd like to hear any comments on this.  I've cc'ed
> > Duane Nickull, to get the ebArchitecture opinion on the "anonymous" use
> > case.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Matt
Next in thread → Next in month →