Thus spoke Matthew MacKenzie () on Thu, May 20, 2004 at 12:54:42PM -0300:
> So, something like the following may be a good idea..:
>
> cid:<soapBody | attachmentID>[#XPath]
>
> Producing the following valid URIs...
>
> cid:attachment1
> cid:attachment1#/ContainerElement/Invoice[0]
> cid:soapBody
> cid:soapBody#/Invoice[0]
The last 2 assume that we assign special meaning to the literal
"soapBody", right? Otherwise we'd have to require an ID attribute on
the element to be referenced. cid: really doesn't seem appropriate
for these cases. Wouldn't a fragment with XPath automatically assume
the correct base URI (the current document)?
#/Envelope/Body
#/Envelope/Body/Invoice[0]
Or something like that?
--Pete
Pete Wenzel <>
Senior Architect, SeeBeyond
Standards & Product Strategy
+1-626-471-6311 (US-Pacific)
