← Prev in month ← Prev in thread

Re: [ebxml-bp] Re: [ebsoa] Re: [ebxml-bp] Closing the gap between MSIand BSI and move on

From
Monica J. Martin <>
Date
2005-02-04T20:42:50+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [ebxml-bp] Re: [ebsoa] Re: [ebxml-bp] Closing the gap between MSIand BSI and move on
>> mm1: David, I would suggest we have some clear boundaries before 
>> engaging ebSOA team. Some of the discussion surrounds assumptions 
>> about the role of the MSI or BSI should be clarified by the 
>> experienced parties and experts involved from ebBP and ebMS teams 
>> (not to say there are not experts in ebSOA). Thanks.
>
> Nickull: Those groups are where a lot of FUD comes from surrounding 
> the BSI.  Some people actually stated they believed the BSI was 
> concrete and hence not an abstract artifact.
>
> Abstract = BSI
> Concrete = MS, CPA and BPSS

mm2: Education is always an opportunity Duane. Remember that the/these 
interface(s) may actually become physical in a deployable logical 
environment. I believe our original text surrounding this relationship 
was clear after all. However, I will in more detail review the many 
posts last night and today to see what can be improved upon in the text 
that was agreed to yesterday morning. Thanks.
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread