Comments on WD 17

Comments on 
WD17:

 

- in 5.2.3.3 
(Receipt) need to be more explicit that:

"The value of 
eb:MessageInfo/eb:RefToMessageId must refer to the message of which this signal 
is a receipt."

 

 - in 2.2.2: 
L529: an editorial clarification, that ebXML signals are never taken into 
account in the definition of an MEP:

replace:

"...elements (e.g. ebMS Errors, 
low-level Acknowledgments when using reliability),"

with:

"...elements (e.g. ebMS signal 
messages or units such as errors, receipts, pulling requests, and low-level 
Acknowledgments when using reliability),"

 

- Fig 9, Section 5: 
may be misleading by suggesting it is OK to have both  an eb:PullRequest 
element AND an (or more) eb:Error element, children of the same eb:SignalMessage 
element. The truth is, eb:SignalMessage can have only either one as a child (so 
having both eb:PullRequest and eb:Error in the same ebms message is OK, but they 
would be udner separate eb:SignalMessage elements). Suggestion is to just show a 
single box with solid line, instead of the two+ dashed-lined boxes, and put 
inside: "eb:PullRequest

or

eb:Receipt

or

eb:Error"

 

- add Raja Kailar as 
contributor (representing CDC?)

 

 

Jacques