Assuming Jacques is OK with it, then yes it is OK with me.
On 3/3/2011 4:41 AM, Theo Kramer wrote:
> On 02 Mar 2011, at 11:00 PM, Timothy Bennett wrote:
>
>> The use of the phrase 'business receipt' in AS4 was to distinguish the nature of the AS4/ebMS3 receipt as being sufficient for NRR (non-repuation of receipt). In this sense it is very similar to the RFC3798 Message Disposition Notification response that is used by AS2 as a business receipt for non-repudiation. This receipt in AS4/ebMS3 contains the same information as the MDN, and thus distinguishes itself from the ebMS2 'acknowledgment' or web services reliable messaging acknowledgment.
>>
> Thanks - trust you would be ok if I 'lift' this and add it to the draft...
>
