Paul,
Actually John has to remove a couple of pages already because of
their restriction on 8 page limit. So we can actually add more in
- one page summarizing all the schemas and their purpose - and then the
other showing the XML structure for the 440 cast vote were cut.
I'd suggest adding more pages to round out the overall as well -
including some of the process diagrams from the spec' would be helpful
- we did not really touch on the operational aspects of managing an
election.
Thanks, DW
-------- Original Message --------
Subject:
[election-services] EML Implementation Guide
From: "Paul Spencer"
<>
Date: Thu, June 01, 2006 11:06
am
To: "John Borras" <>
Cc: "eml"
<>
John,
This
looks like a good paper. I am wondering whether it is a bit long as
an
introduction, or rather short as a detailed implementation guide.
It seems
closer to the former, in which case I think I would take out
the rather busy
diagrams. I have less detailed versions if you think
something is needed. In
this case, I might move the Terminology
section later as well.
In terms of detail, at an editorial
level, I would remove the "eg"s and use
words like "such as"
instead. CORE was also renamed a while ago as the
Co-ordinated
Online Record (not Register) of Electors.
Regards
Paul
Spencer
Director
Boynings Consulting
Ltd
http://boynings.co.uk
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To
unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC
that
generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all
your TCs in
OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
