We've heard all of this many times before, so nothing changes. Seems like some of the examples given, eg returning completed ballots by email, only give fuel to the anti-evoting brigade. But as we've said many times before, we need to stay out of this whole debate about internet security, that's not what EML is about. We can say a lot about audit which will cover a lot of the comments in this article but that apart I would not want our webinar to get too deeply involved in this type of debate.
John
-----Original Message-----
From: [mailto:] On Behalf Of David Webber
Sent: 05 March 2012 17:06
To: Election-Services
Subject: [election-services] Online ballot delivery - the nay sayers view
Notice the comments and discussion posted are excellent and point to flaws in the article.
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9224799/Internet_voting_systems_too_insecure_researcher_warns
This certainly can help frame our webinar plans - there's a lot of disinformation in this CW article.
Ignoring the success of Holland with their overseas voting and positioning paper ballots as the gold
standard when clearly everywhere in the world - people see the opposite - ballot stuffing and other
manipulations are rampant.
DW
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:
