I am a big advocate of including energy communications that supports
ancillary services (linking wholesale and retail markets) as well. This
is a large area that's untapped. See some recent work in this area:
-
http://pge.com/includes/docs/pdfs/mybusiness/energysavingsrebates/demandresponse/cs/2009_pacific_gas_and_electric_company_large_commercial_industrial_participating_load_pilot.pdf
- http://drrc.lbl.gov/openadr/pdf/lbnl-2945e.pdf
Thanks,
-Rish
Phil Davis wrote:
> Frances is right of course. John Kueck at Oak Ridge feels there will
> come a time that the demand side is the total resource for reliability
> and regulation. Though I'm not sure of the 100% level, there are
> aspects of ancillary service participation that properly implemented
> and managed would (I think) be more appealing to commercial buildings
> than would traditional DR programs. I have been assuming, perhaps
> wrongly, that our discussions energy communications would include
> support of ancillary services. Is this correct?
> Thanks!
> Phil
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Toby Considine [mailto:] *On Behalf Of
> *Toby Considine
> *Sent:* Monday, April 26, 2010 3:35 PM
> *To:*
> *Cc:*
> *Subject:* FW: FW: [emix] Power storage strategies
>
> I forwarded this conversation to Frances Cleveland, who is working on
> electrical standards for storage management (the complicated process
> we are trying to stay out of). Thee followed back with a an
> interesting analogy of the more valuable types of response dictated by
> ramp time, response time, et al.
>
> tc
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> "If something is not worth doing, it`s not worth doing well" - Peter
> Drucker
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Toby Considine
> TC9, Inc
>
> OASIS Technical Advisory Board
> TC Chair: oBIX & WS-Calendar
>
> TC Editor: EMIX, EnergyInterop
>
>
>
>
>
>
Email:
