Hi Rish,
No, you are not missing something. What I was trying to say was:
If simplicity is the result of all the research in DR, then - in all
likelihood - those results would be a little antithetical to RTP simply
because RTP is anything but simple (with multiple actors and 10s of
intertwined use cases).
With kind regards,
********************************
Michel Kohanim, C.E.O
Universal Devices, Inc.
(p) 818.631.0333
(f) 818.436.0702
http://www.universal-devices.com
********************************
-----Original Message-----
From: Girish Ghatikar [mailto:]
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 8:44 AM
To:
Cc:
Subject: Re: [energyinterop] Groups - DR Programs (DR-Program-DRRC_20090914
SK edits.doc) uploaded
Michel,
It is my understanding that the scope issues to addressed by EI TC for
DR is beyond RTP. I am missing something?
Some sentences from the original EI TC charter purpose that might be
relevant and to revisit:
1. "The Technical Committee will define the interaction of Smart Grids
with their end nodes: Smart Buildings and Facilities, Enterprises,
Industry, Homes, and Vehicles. Dynamic pricing, reliability, and
emergency signals must be communicated through interoperability
mechanisms that meet business needs, scale, use a variety of
communication technologies, maintain security and privacy, and are
reliable."
2. "These specifications will define service interfaces and the data on
which they operate to allow interoperation without requiring deep
knowledge of the systems as they are implemented."
Thanks,
-Rish
Michel Kohanim wrote:
