[humanmarkup] PBS-Doc-personality

Title: PBS-Doc-personality

We didn't have much to say on this one,
too. However, because there are two main recognized formulations of
Personality Modelling, I am making them the base elements of this
complexType.

Subject: [humanmarkup-comment] Base Schema - personality

            
From: Rex Brooks <>

            
To: ,


            
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 06:17:17 -0700

      Hi Everyone,

      The hits just keep coming.

      personality

      This is a ComplexType element with the
abstract attribute. It is

      described/defined as Human Personality
Type used for personality

      modeling. It does not reference other
elements and is not used by

      other elements.

      Provisionally, I am not inclined to
make additions to the

      description/definition of this element
in the Primary Base Schema,

      and that is a decision that I may end
up recommending for the entire

      Primary Base Schema on the basis of
workability or useability

      purposes. I think that, as with several
other elements we have

      discussed and given thought to, this
one also needs to be kept down

      to the simplest definition in the
Primary Base Schema.

      Now, having said that, I am also
beginning to think that the

      Secondary Base Schema may want to be
broken down into specific

      application area sections where
elements like this one can be grouped

      with similar elements (such as emotion
in this case) for the purpose

      of enumerating the secondary systems
that are part of such elements.

      In this case, we have two personality
typing systems, The Enneagram

      and the Meyers-Briggs classification
systems which will need to be

      accommodated in that enumeration.

      So for now, I am not going to suggest
that we include the

      enumeration, or code lists, in the
Primary Base Schema, except, of

      course, for the global datatype
attributes, which I think we need to

      have in the Primary. Also, I don't want
to get ahead of ourselves in

      considering a further breakout or
breakdown or hierarchical tree

      structure for such enumerations, but I
suspect that is what we will

      want to do in separate documents in
order to maximize the operational

      efficiency of applications which use
our schemata.

      Ciao,

      Rex

Subject: [humanmarkup-comment] Re: [humanmarkup] Base Schema -
personality

            
From: Rex Brooks <>

            
To: Rex Brooks <>,

            
,

            
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 05:44:45 -0700

      Oops. I forgot to mention that this
element shares the attribute

      group humlIdentifierAtts. I tend to
take that for granted, but with

      the introductin of a possible new
attribute group for communication

      elements, I better, and we better, be a
bit more careful about this.

      Ciao,

      Rex