← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
[ihc] subcommittees early in the TC process?
Rex: First, good to meet you. Second, I know there are some committees at the Medical Banking Project ( www.mbproject.org ) that might serve as some starting categories. John Casillas ( ) is very interested in promoting interoperability in whatever way he can. I've also been watching the http://www.friends-partners.org/GLOSAS/ project for sometime now and their work suggests the areas of e-health (in this case, 'e-health' is broadband internet based medicine) and accompanying distance education. Ed Dodds <e-dodds.communications/> 615. 429. 8744 cel | tel 508 . 632 . 0370 fax ed1dodds aim 49457096 icq Read <Conmergence/> ---- Original message ---- >Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 07:32:34 -0700 >From: Rex Brooks <> >Subject: [ihc] An Article on Legal Constraints in US, A Question about Issues >To: > > Hi Folks, > Since I keep an eye on Healthcare issues, I noticed this article > today. One of my own conclusions as I have researched this domain off > and on over the last 3 years has been the lack of global standards for > IT other than the broadest ones covered in ISO 11179, and some > topic-specific issues. I would be interested to hear whether there are > significant and similar barriers in Europe and Asia, as if > localization wasn't difficult enough on its own, especially with > different character sets. However, as with many IT issues, the legal > aspects, and the IPR aspects also need to be addressed. So, here's the > article: > http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=29100518 > And, here's the question: > Should we consider establishing subcommittees early in the TC process? > The question relates to the specificity of gathering requirements for > legal issues specifically. As a member of the Web Services for Remote > Portlets TC, I can vouch for the fact that there just isn't enough > warm bodies working on behalf of corporate members to take on any > significant work outside the specific purview of our scope, and our > experience with relying on other TCs to produce their specs in a > timely way to aid in our ongoing work has been somewhat disappointing, > though neither unexpected, nor particularly troubling yet. For > instance, we have had to wait for a year for WSS to reach its > milestone for producing its first suite of specifications, we now face > the task of imlementing those standards and gathering feedback from > those implementations. This then must be factored into WSRP 2.0 if we > can, though, in fact, we may not have enough feedback during the > timeframe we have established for developing WSRP v2.0. I don't know, > obviously, so I can't point out whether, in fact, this is a > large-enough concern to warrant being included in the ihc work. > However, uptake of standards, wherever they are produced is something > that needs to be addressed, so I think that an IHC Legal SC would be a > good idea. > If we are to liaise with other TCs to produce specifications needed in > this domain, we need to be as specific as we can be to avoid tasking > others to survey a field for specific issues before beginning the work > of writing standards to bridge those issues. > BTW, Legal is just one particular domain. For an exercise in how > complex these issues will be, consider how many different specs there > are for defining what a "person" or "address" is. > Just thought I would pass this little reminder along. > Regards, > Rex Brooks > P.S. I am using the long form of my signature here this once so those > of you joining in this initial period can get an idea of what my > interests are. I will add my membership in this TC once I am sure that > I fit into the work here. > > -- > > Rex Brooks > President, Stabourne Communications Design > Executive Director, Humanmarkup.org, Inc. > Co-Chair, Secretary, OASIS HumanMarkup Technical Committee > Co-Chair OASIS Human Physical Characteristics Description Markup > Language Subcommittee > Member, OASIS Web Services for Remote Portlets Technical Committee > Member, OASIS Web Services for Remote Portlets-Primer Subcommittee > Member OASIS Emergency Management Technical Committee > Co-Chair Emergency Management Notification Methods and Messages > Subcommittee > Member, OASIS Emergency Management Geospatial Information Services > Subcomittee > GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison, Berkeley, CA, 94702 USA, Earth > W3Address: http://www.starbourne.com > Email: > Tel: 510-849-2309 > Fax: By Request
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread