← Prev in month ← Prev in thread

Re: [legalcite-markup-discuss] Jurisdictional scope

From
Chet Ensign <>
Date
2013-10-03T21:13:04+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [legalcite-markup-discuss] Jurisdictional scope
Hi Frank, 

"Is the establishment (and maintenance) of canonical lists
for these two (for the latter, at least for the US jurisdiction,
initially) within the scope of the proposal?" 

That's a good question - and one that we ought to consider as we move towards better defining the scope of the work. 

Speaking for myself, I think the current consensus is that we ought to make the development of such canonical lists possible and provide a framework for how they could be done - but not take on the creation and maintenance ourselves. But perhaps others would see that differently. 

Certainly something that needs added thought as part of developing the charter. 

Best, 

/chet  

On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Frank Bennett <> wrote:

Patrick raises an important point about jurisdictional scope. From his

note to another thread:

*****

Link: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/legalcite-markup-discuss/201309/msg00004.html

*****

I think that it is important to keep world-wide scope in view, while

acknowledging both that we can't get there in one go, and that it will

be an ever-receding target (which does not conflict with Patrick's

point, as I understand it).

This got me to thinking, and I have a couple of questions. For

world-wide (and historical) coverage, we would need a set of concrete

jurisdiction specifiers, such as contemplated by the LEX:URN draft.

Also, within a given jurisdiction there is a finite number of

reporters/sources for primary legal text, with local conventions for

their abbreviation in citations. Both of these (jurisdiction

identifiers and journal abbreviations) are areas where there is a fair

amount of variance across projects, and a good deal of chaos out in

the wild. Is the establishment (and maintenance) of canonical lists

for these two (for the latter, at least for the US jurisdiction,

initially) within the scope of the proposal?

Frank

---------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe, e-mail: 

For additional commands, e-mail: 

-- 

/chet 
----------------
Chet Ensign
Director of Standards Development and TC Administration 
OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society

http://www.oasis-open.org

Primary: +1 973-996-2298
Mobile: +1 201-341-1393 

Check your work using the Support Request Submission Checklist at http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/47248/tc-admin-submission-checklist.html 

TC Administration information and support is available at http://www.oasis-open.org/resources/tcadmin

Follow OASIS on:
LinkedIn:    http://linkd.in/OASISopen

Twitter:        http://twitter.com/OASISopen
Facebook:  http://facebook.com/oasis.open
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread