I think Dr. Leff is to be commended on the comprehensiveness of his notes.
I do have a request for a few clarifications.
1. I had understood at the Salt Lake meeting and from our Charter that all decisions of the TC would be made on the list and not in the F2F meetings, in order to enable non-meeting-attendee participants an opportunity to participate in the voting.
To my understanding, a group of TC participants not at the meeting did not participate in all of these decisions: being those members who called in on the bridge but for one reason or another could not actually remain on the line or hear sufficiently well to participate.
Do I have this understanding correctly?
If so, should there be some follow-up procedure to finalize the decisions listed in the minutes?
2. With regard to the Forms preliminary work, I had understood that I was to do preparatory work and report back to the full TC what I saw as the steps, tasks and hurdles to creating a Court Filing Forms Scope and Requirements Document, and not also actually to prepare such a Document myself.
I would prefer to proceed with the preparatory work, in part because there is no clear standardized method for creating XML forms, and this may present special issues that were not present with regard to CF 1.1 and CD 1.1.
However, if it is the sense of the TC that I should actually go forward with a Court Filing Forms Scope and Requirements Document, I respectfully ask for other volunteers to assist me in this task.
Otherwise, I am in agreement with the minutes as posted.
