MHonArc v2.5.2 -->
legalxml-courtfiling message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Proposed "person" object
From: "Poindexter, Gary W" <>
To: "'Krause, Catherine'" <>," ()"<>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 13:11:30 -0400
Title: RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Proposed "person" object
So
maybe to be fair to GTRI and the current taskforce (although I would expect the
current taskforce to be aware) they need to know that the court filing DTD
is (apparently) being widely implemented and that the constructs of the DTD are
as important in the justice community as the base Justice Data Dictionary - or
nearly as important because of the number of pending
implementations.
None
of my sources have seen responses from RISS, anyone know what their reaction has
been?
Catherine points out several initiatives directly related to the court
filing DTD. What I haven't heard are others like myself who are modeling
solutions outside of the court space using the court filing DTD concepts. Not
sure that this thread has that much reach, I encourage others to share the
thread as widely as possible.
gary
