MHonArc v2.5.2 -->
legalxml-courtfiling message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Proposed "person" object
From: jkeane <>
To:
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 17:41:54 -0400
Title: RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Proposed "person" object
Thanks for
the clarification Rolly. Let me remind folks of a cross-posting (that
crossed in the mail) to the public list about the OdrXML data model using a
"Persona." Shouldn't this very interesting thread go beyond
CourtFiling?
It's not
clear to me if some of the strong advocates, experts and apparent
aficionados of data modeling are on CF list, but they sure speak out a
Integrated Justice meetings. I'm not sure I understand enough about the
sub-class concept to make an informed judgment. We could use their
help.
In
addition, as my note suggested, don't we need a pretty high level model
that accommodates the life cycle from transactions to civil disputes as well
as criminal activity? Perhaps we could model Enron in
XML?
And are other
XML groups beyond the law wrestling with any comparable situation? Are
there any well known solutions from other systems to the semantic problems
we are encountering here?
Jim
James I. Keane
JKeane.Law.Pro
North Potomac MD
20878
