RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] JXDDS Person Object

From
System
Date
2002-09-23T13:54:00+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] JXDDS Person Object
MHonArc v2.5.2 -->

legalxml-courtfiling message

[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [Elist Home]

Subject: RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] JXDDS Person Object

From: "Lewis, Diane" <>

To: "'Durham, Shane (LNG-CL)'" <>,

Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 13:45:18 -0400

agree.. with you Shane..
even if authors cannot attend face to face meeting... use of teleconference would be helpful during the meeting to clarify decision to be made.    

i provide some comment on this matter earlier based on the original drawing....

i will restate my thoughts after further study.. but for now the federal court and federal attorney perspective  from discussions with others would not support use of actor/role.... 

Note: the use of the term actor in current IT development is a term used in Unified Modeling Language by developers.. 

In development context system users are described as actors in specific system use scenarios ... the actor is motivated to use a particular system based on the user "role"(s)..  for example Case Clerk Actor can be filled by several different members of a USAO's paraprofessional staff.

the use of the tag will be expanded beyond transmission...... it must be mapped to or based on an existing business rule or recognizable justice community practice/procedure... to be easily identified by the justice community...   diane lewis usdoj/eousa