Atlanta face to face draft agenda

MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

















legalxml-courtfiling message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Atlanta face to face draft agenda




From: "John M. Greacen" <>
To: "'Electronic Court Filing Technical Committeee'" <>
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 17:44:14 -0600














The UML class diagram session in  was very
successful in modeling the Review Filing message.  We reached a number of significant
decisions that are included in the attached meeting summary as recommendations
to the TC.  Scott will post the full class diagram
and the schema mapping sometime this weekend.  Eric will post the next version of the
nonfunctional specification this weekend as well.



We will have three conference calls during the  face to face –
at 4:30 Eastern on Monday and Tuesday and at 10:30 am Eastern on Wednesday.  The information for the calls is 



        Conference Dial-in:
512-225-3050

        Conference Guest Code:
84759#

        Leader's Phone Number:
505-780-1450



 



Electronic Court
Filing Technical Committee

Face to Face Meeting




Administrative Office of the Courts

244
 St.SW

 




Judicial Conference Room on the 5th floor



Monday, June 6th
– 1:00 pm to 5:00 pm

Tuesday, June 7th
– 8:00 am to 5:00 pm

Wednesday, June 8th
– 8:00 am to 11:00 am



Draft Agenda



Monday afternoon – 

Approval of the agenda – John Greacen

XSTF directions
on amending GJXDM element definitions – Tom Carlson

Review Filing Message – UML Class Diagram and GJXDM
reference document – Scott Came



Tuesday morning – 

Nonfunctional requirements –
Eric Tingom



Tuesday afternoon – 

Additional Filing Messages –
Scott Came



Wednesday morning – 

Queries – Scott Came

Final steps in completing the
specification and schemas



We have the following additional issues pending that will be addressed during the course of the meeting:



Local extensions to the Blue schema



Definition of lead document –
Can we come up with a definition independent of how the court chooses to handle
each document type in its own docketing process?



Use of the entity seal and its
inclusion as a mandatory or recommended feature of the specification



How we handle IP policies in all incorporated
standards



Whether we use message components as
defined within GJXDM or as defined within a message
profile standard that we use



Structure of the Blue message (now
contained within the summary of the UML Class diagram
session)



Whether we need to define additional
messages for service



How Court Filing Policy will be addressed



The official name for Blue – “Blue”
was a provisional name assigned until we were ready to assign a version number.
 Is this ECF
2.0 or ECF 3.0?





I am sure that there are additional unresolved issues that I
have failed to record.  I welcome
any TC member’s
bringing them to my attention.  







John
M. Greacen

Greacen
Associates, LLC

HCR 



505-289-2164

505-289-2163
(fax)

505-780-1450
(cell)










Minutes.doc












[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]