RE: [legalxml-intj-exmndr] Review of Tom's Section 2 Draft

From
Carlson, Tom <>
Date
2005-03-24T14:10:34+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [legalxml-intj-exmndr] Review of Tom's Section 2 Draft
Title: Message

Re: "UML Class 
diagrams may be a generated artifact..." 

 

URL Integration's 
Data Modeler could for one. I've been told there are also plenty of 
business-rules tools out there that could do the same. I know Scott's had great 
sucess with using UML directly in a working group setting, but not all working 
groups are going to have a facilitator of Scott's caliber. We need to keep the 
door open to other methods and tools while stressing the use of UML as the final 
representation.

 

Re: "UML Class 
diagrams...are not necessarily the instrument used to determine the data and 
relationships"

 

The alternative 
would be whatever the business tool used. Data Modeler has its 
visualization method. Other tools would have their own. It's just a 
simpler means of getting to the same point that Scott gets to directly in 
UML. Would it be better to say "are not necessarily the 
initial instrument used to determine the data and 
relationships"?

  

  
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Came 
  [mailto:] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 
  12:50 PM
To: 
  
Subject: 
  [legalxml-intj-exmndr] Review of Tom's Section 2 Draft

Tom 
  and fellow subcommittee members:

I've just had a first look at Tom's 
  draft of Section 2. I think it's a good start, with section headers for the 
  appropriate stuff.

I have one substantive comment. Tom, on lines 
  135-138, you suggest that "UML Class diagrams may be a generated artifact..." 
  My question is, generated from what?

Also, if "UML Class diagrams...are 
  not necessarily the instrument used to determine the data and 
  relationships"...what alternative instrument would you 
  suggest?

Thanks.
--Scott

Scott Came
President and 
  Principal Consultant
Justice Integration Solutions, Inc.
Olympia, 
  Washington
360-402-6525

http://www.justiceintegration.com