Yes, this more accurately reflects what we agreed to.
Jim, perhaps you can offer an argument as to making
XMI optional?
> My minor suggested tweaks are included below in bold.
>
>
>
--- Ellen
>
> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
>
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
> material. If you received this in
error, please contact the sender and
> delete the material from any computer.
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: Scott Came
[mailto:]
> Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 11:13 AM
> To:
> Subject: [legalxml-intj-exmndr] Recap of issue on domain
modeling
>
>
> Here is what I took as consensus from our discussion this morning. I
> agree with this; Tom, since you were the other active participant in the
> discussion, could you please
post back with your agreement as well, or
> suggested modifications. Others feel free to chime in as well. I
will
> then make sure this gets into the Domain Modeling section in the MNDR.
>
> (Again,
keep in mind, we're saying what's necessary for compliance with
> the MNDR, not that the whole world should do
what we say.)
>
> 1. A domain model must be created.
>
> 2. The domain model must
be at least one of: a spreadsheet, a
> concept map, or a UML class diagram. (What these things are, in
detail,
> will be described in the document.)
>
> 3. The domain model should be a UML class
diagram.
>
> 4. If the domain model is a UML class diagram, then the diagram must be
>
supplied in XMI and image (JPG or PNG) format. The image format must
> not contain symbols or notation that
are not part of standard UML class
> diagrams.
>
> 5. Nothing in this specification
precludes a domain model from being
> documented, published, or displayed using diagramming notation other
> than standard UML, provided that the domain model also be supplied
> according to the provisions of
rule #4.
>
> 6. The domain-GJXDM mapping artifact must not rely on (replaces
>
"reference ") any domain model concept or element that is not
> represented in standard UML
notation. Proprietary concepts may be
> included in the mapping artifact as long as they do not determine
the
> mapping results.
>
> Thanks, everyone.
> --Scott
>
>
