RE: [legalxml-sc] Wednesday Conference Call

From
James Cabral
Date
2005-01-10T21:09:00+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [legalxml-sc] Wednesday Conference Call
MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

legalxml-sc message

[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]

Subject: RE: [legalxml-sc] Wednesday Conference Call

From: "Cabral, James E." <>

To: "Winters, Roger" <>,<>

Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:08:52 -0800

Title: RE: [legalxml-sc] Wednesday Conference Call

Roger,

 

I prefer not to meet this week.  I am available on the 
19th.

 

Jim 
Cabral 

 

From: Winters, Roger 
[mailto:]
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 
8:29 AM
To: 
Subject: RE: 
[legalxml-sc] Wednesday Conference Call

I am not opposed to the meeting going forward without my or 
John's being on the call -- we need five to have a quorum and conduct business 
officially. However, John Messing's point is well taken. Nevertheless, 
rescheduling a group of 8 people, as you know, can be daunting. 

So...I pose these questions--please respond to the group when 
you can: 

1) Do you prefer to go ahead with the Steering Committee 
conference call, as scheduled? 

2) If the meeting were postponed one week, to Wednesday, January 
19, 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time (11:00 a.m. Pacific time), would you be able to 
participate in it?

(I would be available to participate on January 19.) 

Roger Winters
Programs and Projects 
Manager
King County
Department 
of Judicial Administration
516 Third Avenue, E-609 MS: 
KCC-JA-0609
Seattle, Washington 98104
V: (206) 296-7838 F: (206) 296-0906