MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
legalxml-sc message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: RE: [legalxml-sc] re: Appreciation Certificates
From: "Bergeron, Donald L. \(LNG-DAY\)" <>
To: "Winters, Roger" <>, <>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:44:00 -0500
Title: RE: [legalxml-sc] re: Appreciation Certificates
I agree with Roger!
Regards,
Don
Donald L. Bergeron
Systems Designer
LexisNexis
O 937-865-1276
H 937-748-2775
M 937-672-7781
From: Winters, Roger
[mailto:]
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006
2:39 PM
To: 'John Messing';
Subject: RE: [legalxml-sc] re:
Appreciation Certificates
I think a
nicely printed certificate is far better than what would essentially be an
email attachment - and what if the recipient doesn't have a color printer to
use and would like to capture the humor and uniqueness of this certificate
compared with others they've received.
My
2-cents.
Roger
-----Original
Message-----
From: John Messing [mailto:]
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006
11:35 AM
To:
Subject: [legalxml-sc] re:
Appreciation Certificates
Perhaps
we could offer to furnish a printed certificate if a recipient
would like us to. Otherwise, an
interested recipient could print one
himself/herself.
Does
anyone have a strong feeling one way or the other?
=================================================================================
Do you
then not need me to make a hard copy printout of the
certificates? Instead you'll
present them at some occasion
electronically? (I personally don't
expect to be attending any
occasions prior to E-Courts in
December, if that.)
Roger
-----Original
Message-----
From: John Messing [mailto:]
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006
11:24 AM
To:
Subject: RE: [legalxml-sc]
Appreciation Certificates
Dear all:
Since the
certificates each indicates they it bears my signature, I
thought it might be appropriate to
sign them using a combination of the
application-specific and
proxy-signature profiles of EFC 3.0. I
converted them first to PDF and
then uploaded them for signing to the
Law-on-Line server, which signed
them by proxy based upon its
authentication of me. They are
attached.
If the SC
feels they are suitable, I thought we might present them to
the recipients at a suitable time.
Best
regards.
>
