RE: [legalxml-sc] re: Appreciation Certificates

From
John Greacen
Date
2006-02-13T20:10:00+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [legalxml-sc] re: Appreciation Certificates
MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

legalxml-sc message

[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]

Subject: RE: [legalxml-sc] re: Appreciation Certificates

From: "John M. Greacen" <>

To: "'Winters, Roger'" <>,"'John Messing'" <>,"'Bergeron,Donald L. \(LNG-DAY\)'" <>

Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:10:10 -0700

Title: RE: [legalxml-sc] re: Appreciation Certificates

I think signing is superfluous, especially
since you have already signed them electronically.

From: Winters, Roger
[mailto:]

Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006
12:49 PM

To: ; Bergeron,Donald L. (LNG-DAY)

Cc:


Subject: RE: [legalxml-sc] re:
Appreciation Certificates

I'll
print them on glossy photo paper. Writing an inked signature on that isn't
always successful. They'll know they're signed - in spirit, electronically, and
they can get an autograph sometime when we're together if they want.

Roger 

-----Original
Message-----

From: John Messing [mailto:] 

Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006
11:48 AM

To: Bergeron,Donald L. (LNG-DAY)

Cc: Winters, Roger;


Subject: RE: [legalxml-sc] re:
Appreciation Certificates 

If Roger
is willing to do the printing, then by all means we should give

them printed certificates. Roger:
Do you want to send me them when done

for physical signatures, or do you
have another idea? 

>