Rolly,
Yes, that's what the ballot says and what I meant.
Sorry for the confusion.
jim
From: Rolly Chambers
[mailto:]
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 12:49
PM
To:
Cc:
;
Subject: RE:
[legalxml-sc] IJTC update
Is the “restricted
royalty-free IPR policy” the same thing as the “royalty-free on limited terms”
IPR mode in the Oasis IPR policy for TCs
(http://www.oasis-open.org/who/intellectualproperty.php)?
If so, this is
good.
Rolly
Chambers
From: Cabral,
James E. [mailto:]
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 12:25
PM
To:
Cc: ;
Subject: [legalxml-sc] IJTC
update
LegalXML Steering
Committee,
Good news. We had a meeting of
the Integrated Justice Technical Committee today in which we agreed
to:
1.
Hold a web vote to transition to the new restricted royalty-free IPR policy
before the April 15 deadline.
2. Hold a web vote on formalizing
the Modeling, Naming and Design Rules specification as a Committee
Draft.
3. Have a conference call in May
to:
- Ascertain
the next steps of the TC after the release of NIEM 2.0 including a possible new
charter
- Elect (or
re-elect?) the representative to the Steering Committee
Jim
Cabral
James E. Cabral Jr.
MTG Management Consultants,
L.L.C.
(206)
442-5010
www.mtgmc.com
The
information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is
addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from
any computer.
