John, I'll go back and review that, see how to work it in. Many-to-many makes this a *much* more interesting problem <grin> /c
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Miano, John (LNG-HBE) <> wrote:
> I may have mentioned this before (because I see some of my suggestions incorporated). That said, another issue is that a single opinion can have multiple citations under the current system. Each reporter an opinion is in creates a new citation. Supreme Court opinions routinely get three citations. State opinions citations. Some specialized reporters create additional citations. >
> That is in addition to a single citation point to multiple opinions. Many-to-many. >
> John > >
