Re: [legalxml-courtfiling-chair] SCOTUS Riley Decision on Wednesday

Hi Jim,
Speaking both for Yaana as well as the eWarrant
rapporteur at ETSI TCLI, we are very interested in
moving this forward; although a unanimous Supreme
Court decision and opinion by the Chief Justice certainly
trumps everything.
In beginning to contact some of the local jurisdictions
cited by the C.J., it appears in most cases that someone
locally simply went forward with an implementation an
obtained in some instances, related changes to the State
rules under which they operated.
At the international level when we moved forward with
a definitive global eWarrant spec about 18 months ago,
we found a similar phenomenon where individual
jurisdictions simply started to implement something
that met their immediate needs.  As a result, the draft
spec was designed from the start to be very flexible
and extensible.  This included low end implementations
that consisted of a PDF attachment.
--tony
On 2014-07-07 10:39 AM, James E Cabral
wrote:
I agree - eWarrants is a potential area for development in
LegalXML, although I see warrants as an integrated justice
exchange rather than an extension of court electronic filing.  I
am CCing the LegalXML Steering Committee so that they may
consider this new area.
--
________________________________
Tony
Rutkowski
EVP, Industry
Standards & Regulatory Affairs

Yaana
Technologies LLC
542 Gibraltar
Drive
Milpitas CA
95035 USA