Maybe "MQTT Control Message"?
Pavan Reddy
Solutions Architect
Cisco Systems
408-894-3353
On 6/4/13 8:51 AM, "OASIS Issues Tracker"
<> wrote:
>
> [
>http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/MQTT-17?page=com.atlassian.jira.
>plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=33637#actio
>n_33637 ]
>
>Richard Coppen commented on MQTT-17:
>------------------------------------
>
>"MQTT protocol message" would seem a good fit. Any thoughts ?
>
>> Terminology for MQTT command message.
>> -------------------------------------
>>
>> Key: MQTT-17
>> URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/MQTT-17
>> Project: OASIS Message Queuing Telemetry Transport (MQTT) TC
>> Issue Type: Improvement
>> Components: core
>> Reporter: Andrew Banks
>>
>> We need to use a consistent term for the MQTT command messages. This
>>needs to differentiate it from the application payload message.
>> I have used "MQTT command message" but this does not fit well where the
>>message is a response eg CONNACK.
>> Other terms that have been used are "Flow" and "Packet".
>
>--
>This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
>-
>If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
>http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
>-
>For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
>generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
>https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>
