RE: [oasis-charter-discuss] Re: Proposed Charter for OASIS Business Document Exchange (BusDox) TC

From
Pim van der Eijk <>
Date
2010-10-27T19:00:39+00:00
ID
06AAE579458A4040904232B6828D8879@Roussanne
Thread
RE: [oasis-charter-discuss] Re: Proposed Charter for OASIS Business Document Exchange (BusDox) TC
BizDocs:

"BIZdocs® Document Management System"

http://www.ees.com.tr/?p=002&l=1

 

Registered Trademark Symbol:

"The registered trademark symbol, designated by ® (the circled 
"R") and also known as a racol[citation needed] (derived from Registered & 
Authorised Company Logo), is a symbol used to provide notice that the preceding 
mark is a trademark or service mark that has been registered with a national 
trademark office."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Registered_trademark_symbol

From: Peter F Brown (OASIS Individual Member) 
[mailto:] 
Sent: 27 October 2010 
20:38
To: 'Pim van der Eijk'
Cc: 

Subject: RE: 
[oasis-charter-discuss] Re: Proposed Charter for OASIS Business Document 
Exchange (BusDox) TC

I’m 
a native European English speaker and BusDox just doesn’t do it for me. I agree 
with Jon that BizDocs is sharper and clearer, whatever any feeling there may be 
about “Biz” being an Americanism…

 

BizDocs 
doesn’t seem to be a claimed as a service mark or trademark (registered or not), 
and certainly isn’t claimed as such by either e-bizdocs.com or bizdocs.com, the 
two potential contenders.

In 
the case of E-BizDocs the fact that they have sought protection of a company 
slogan as a trademark but explicitly *not* the name “BizDocs”, would 
reinforce this PoV…

 

Cheers,

Peter

 

 

From: Pim van 
der Eijk [mailto:] 
Sent: Wednesday, 27 October, 
2010 08:55
To: 'Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress'; 

Subject: RE: 
[oasis-charter-discuss] Re: Proposed Charter for OASIS Business Document 
Exchange (BusDox) TC

 

Very funny.   (At least,  I'm assuming this is 
intended to be funny.  But I can't really tell, as I'm not a native speaker 
of English).

 

You may have noted that some of the co-proposers of this 
charter are native speakers of English.   I will check 
again,  but as far as I know it was one of them that actually proposed 
this abbreviation.   I never questioned the abbreviation as I 
only got involved in the discussions when the abbreviation "BusDox" was already 
there.  

 

FYI, there is also an OASIS DITA BusDocs SC.  

http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=dita-busdocs 

DITA BusDocs means "DITA Enterprise Business Documents 
SC"

It looks like the vast majority of the members of this SC are 
native speakers of English.  

 

A quick Internet search seems to show that BIZdocs is some trademark, 
so it would violate the following TC process rule:

"The name of the TC, such name not to have been previously used for 
an OASIS TC and not to include any trademarks or service marks not owned by 
OASIS". 

http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process.php

 

I'm tempted to continue but I think I should stop here.

 

 

 

From: Ray 
Denenberg, Library of Congress [mailto:] 
Sent: 27 October 
2010 17:27
To: 

Subject: RE: 
[oasis-charter-discuss] Re: Proposed Charter for OASIS Business Document 
Exchange (BusDox) TC

"they 
will
assume that the work of the group has something to do with 
buses
and then puzzle unfruitfully over what "dox" could refer 
to."

I didn't 
have any trouble with "dox". I assume it meant "docks" and that the spec had to 
do with where to park buses. 

--Ray