TC ArchivesMailing list preservation

[OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (ODATA-342) Can we relax the requirement of int64 numbers being represented as strings in the JSON Format for integer numbers that don't lose precision in ECMAScript when represented as numbers?

odata · April 2013 · 3 messages · back to month

# Subject From Date
00114 [OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (ODATA-342) Can we relax the requirement of int64 numbers being represented as strings in the JSON Format for integer numbers that don't lose precision in ECMAScript when represented as numbers? OASIS Issues Tracker 2013-04-12 15:58
00120 [OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (ODATA-342) Can we relax the requirement of int64 numbers being represented as strings in the JSON Format for integer numbers that don't lose precision in ECMAScript when represented as numbers? OASIS Issues Tracker 2013-04-12 16:16
00121 [OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (ODATA-342) Can we relax the requirement of int64 numbers being represented as strings in the JSON Format for integer numbers that don't lose precision in ECMAScript when represented as numbers? OASIS Issues Tracker 2013-04-12 16:30