Re: [office-collab] Comparison generic-ct-proposal and extended-ct-proposal

Hi John,

    

    thank you for your input, I'll change the document accordingly, see
    attachment. The most common use case for "delete an element but not
    its content" is removing a styled span, so you are right, this can
    be expressed using text:format-change. Another use case for
    remove-leaving-content is removing a text:section without removing
    its content. Do we want to handle this as a text:format-change as
    well?

    

    Regards,

    

    Frank

    

    On 29.03.2011 01:40, John Haug wrote:
    
      
      
      
      
      

        
Thanks, Frank – this is a handy start for a
            side-by-side.

        
 

        
I think there is one correction to note, though. 
            Row 4 indicates the “extended” proposal has no construct to
            support “delete an element but not its content”.  Or, in a
            document-centric context, removing a style from a piece of
            text.  That can be directly extrapolated from the patterns
            established by the
            Add a New Style examples, which demonstrate more
            complex cases.

        
 

        
Example
            document content:

        
Remove bold
          à Remove bold

        
Starting
            markup:

        
<text:p>Remove
          

        
   <text:span
          text:style-name="BoldStyle">bold</text:span>

        
</text:p>

        
Ending markup:

        
<text:p>Remove
          bold</text:p>

        
Change-tracked
            markup:

        
<text:tracked-changes>

        
   <text:changed-region
          text:id="1">

        
       <text:format-change>

        
         
          <office:change-info>
          … </office:change-info>

        
         
            <text:span
          text:style-name="BoldStyle">

        
       </text:format-change>

        
   </text:changed-region>

        
</text:tracked-changes>

        
<text:p>Remove

        
   <ct:format-change-start
          ct:id="1"/>bold

        
   <ct:format-change-end
          ct:id="1"/>

        
</text:p>

        
Thanks,

        
John

        
 

        

          

            
From: Frank Meies
                [mailto:]
                

                Sent: Friday, March 25, 2011 6:13 AM

                To: 

                Subject: [office-collab] Comparison
                generic-ct-proposal and extended-ct-proposal

          

        

        
 

        
Hi all,

          

          while trying to get familiar with the
          extended-change-tracking-proposal I created a document giving
          a brief overview of how some of the use cases are handled by
          the two proposals. If you find this useful, we can upload the
          file and anyone who feels to do so can add more use cases.

          

          Best regards,

          

          Frank

        

          
-- 

            

            Frank Meies | Software Developer

              Phone: +49 49 23646 500 

            Oracle OFFICE GBU

              

              ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Nagelsweg 55 |
              20097 Hamburg

            

            ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG

              Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München

              Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA 95603

              

              Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V.

              Rijnzathe 6, 3454PV De Meern, Niederlande

              Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr.
              30143697

              Geschäftsführer: Jürgen Kunz, Marcel van de Molen,
              Alexander van der Ven

            

            Oracle is committed to developing practices and
              products that help protect the environment
            

        

      

    
    

    
-- 

      

      Frank Meies | Software Developer

        Phone: +49 49 23646 500
        

        Oracle OFFICE GBU

        

        ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Nagelsweg 55 | 20097
        Hamburg

      

      ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG

        Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München

        Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA 95603

        

        Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V.

        Rijnzathe 6, 3454PV De Meern, Niederlande

        Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr.
        30143697

        Geschäftsführer: Jürgen Kunz, Marcel van de Molen, Alexander van
        der Ven

      
      

      
      Oracle is committed to developing practices and
        products that help protect the environment
      
    

  

ct_proposal_comparison.odt