wrote:
> I don't think any of the two proposals are necessary incorrect. It comes
> down to a question: Where do you put the intelligence in the system? Do
> you assume intelligent writers who produce documents that have the change
> tracking state recorded in detail and then are processable generically by
> relatively simple readers?
>
Hi Rob,
um, unless the reader processes the generic ct information on the xml
level, it's not gonna be simple at all. So we're talking about a
rather constrained subset of readers here.
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
