On Monday 18 June 2012 16:44:52 Robin LaFontaine wrote:
> Patrick,
>
> Thanks for these examples - I think it would help if we all encoded
> exactly the same sample, so here is my suggestion (which is subject to
> your approval that I have interpreted your cases correctly)
>
> 1st Case
>
> 1. Original saved by 1st author
> <text:p>This is the original paragraph, created with change tracking on so
> seen as an added paragraph.</text:p>
>
> 2. 2nd author changes text:
> <text:p>This is the second version of the paragraph, created with change
> tracking on so seen as a modifed paragraph.</text:p>
>
> Transferred back to 1st author, but that is not a further change.
>
> 2nd case
>
> 1. Original
> <text:p>This is the original paragraph, created with change tracking on so
> seen as an added paragraph.</text:p>
>
> 2. 1st author changes text:
> <text:p>This is the original paragraph, created with change tracking on so
> seen as an added paragraph, which is then modified.</text:p>
>
> 3. 1st author changes text again:
> <text:p>This is the modified paragraph, created with change tracking on so
> seen as an added paragraph, which is further modified.</text:p>
>
> Are these specific examples OK?
>
> Robin
Hi
Yes this would serve as a good example where we can easily compare the
various encodings of change tracking
