RE: [office-comment] 1.2 para 3.1.7

From
Alex Brown <>
Date
2008-07-02T04:49:11+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [office-comment] 1.2 para 3.1.7
> Yeah.  We need GUID's for people.

The work on ISNI - International Standard Name Identifiers (ISO 27729 -
in draft) is worth tracking if we're thinking about using IDs for
parties ...

- Alex.

> 
> -Rob
> 
> 
> 
> 
> "Dennis E. Hamilton" <>
> 07/01/2008 10:58 AM
> Please respond to
> <>
> 
> 
> To
> <>
> cc
> "'Dave Pawson'" <>
> Subject
> RE: [office-comment] 1.2 para 3.1.7
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> My biggest problem with these Dublin Core elements is not the
semantics
> but the absence of any syntax whatsoever (well, beyond "a string" more
> or
> less).
> 
> That may not be a problem in the uses made in ODF, but it is a
> nightmare
> with regard to metadata consistency and attempting to automatically
> catalog from document profiles in repositories, especially if some
> applications are designed to fill this in automatically with something
> as
> strange as the logged-in-user ID (not mentioning any names).
> 
> I am not sure this is an ODF problem, but it strikes me as very much a
> Dublin Core problem.
> 
>  - Dennis
> 
> Dennis E. Hamilton
> ------------------
> NuovoDoc: Design for Document System Interoperability
> mailto: | gsm:+1-206.779.9430
> http://NuovoDoc.com http://ODMA.info/dev/ http://nfoWorks.org
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-
> comment/200807/msg00009.html
> From: Dave Pawson [mailto:]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 03:17
> To: 
> Subject: [office-comment] 1.2 para 3.1.7
> 
> The <dc:creator> element specifies the name of the person who last
> modified the document. The name of this element was chosen for
> compatibility with the Dublin Core, but this definition of "creator"
> used here differs from Dublin Core, which defines creator as "An
> entity primarily responsible for making the content of the resource."
> 
> 
> If the semantics are different from dublin core please use a different
> element name.
> There is no point in diluting DC semantics.
> 
> regards
> 
> --
> Dave Pawson
> XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
> http://www.dpawson.co.uk
> 
> 
> --
> This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the
> OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC.
> 
> In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and
> to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required
> before posting.
> 
> Subscribe: 
> Unsubscribe: 
> List help: 
> List archive: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/
> Feedback License: http://www.oasis-
> open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf
> List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
> Committee:
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=office
>