Rob,
wrote:
> In fact, this list should be used purely for public comment submissions on
> the ODF standard. It is not intended to be a discussion list.
>
> The ODF TC hosts another list for that can be used for more general
> ODF-related discussions, opendocument-users, which can be subscribed to
> from here: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
>
>
Just to clarify, err, we can discuss the comments that are submitted on
this list, Yes? That is I can ask for clarification, perhaps make
suggestions, etc.
I assume you mean that discussions of the substance of the comment, that
is what the TC should or should not do, etc., should be on the TC list?
I know hard and fast distinctions are probably not possible but just
wanted to be as clear as we can be about the use of this list.
Hope you are having a great day!
Patrick
> Regards,
>
> -Rob
>
> -------------------
>
> "Dennis E. Hamilton" <> wrote on 07/07/2008
> 12:39:11 PM:
>
>
>> On looking over my own words, I propose the following amendments:
>>
>> 1. It's not like you can argue with someone about what their personal
>> opinion is. **One might ask about the basis for such an opinion, but I
>> think that particular conversation would be off-topic here.** I could
>>
> argue
>
>> with the veracity of the **rejoinder's** particular quoted statements
>>
> and
>
>> ...
>>
>> 2. And added to the PS: In any case, I think the appropriate attention
>>
> here
>
>> is on the review and improvement of ODF, not allegations about other
>> specifications.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/200807/msg00065.html
>> From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:]
>> Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 09:11
>> To: 'ODF Comments List'
>> Cc: 'MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)'; 'Sheldon Britton'
>> Subject: RE: [office-comment] 8.5.4 of ODF 1.0
>>
>> [ ... ]
>>
>> When someone gives their personal opinion about something (as MURATA
>>
> did), I
>
>> don't think it is appropriate to drag in appeals to authorities. It's
>>
> not
>
>> like you can argue with someone about what their personal opinion is. I
>> could argue with the veracity of the particular quoted statements and
>>
> the
>
>> non sequitur based on them, but I think that would be seriously
>>
> off-topic.
>
>> [ ... ]
>>
>> - Dennis
>>
>> PS: To be clear, I have no opinion whatsoever on the comparison that
>>
> MURATA
>
>> made, and I certainly can claim no perspective on the relative
>> translatability of the two specifications to another language. I would
>>
> have
>
>> simply passed over that comparison but for it having attracted lightning
>> here.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the
>> OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC.
>>
>> In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and
>> to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required
>> before posting.
>>
>> Subscribe:
>> Unsubscribe:
>> List help:
>> List archive: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/
>> Feedback License: http://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf
>> List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
>> Committee:
>>
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=office
>
>
>
--
Patrick Durusau
Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34
Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps)
Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300
Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)
