Michael,
> First of all, the paragraph you are referring to here is not subject of
> the errata. The errata corrects the last paragraph of section 17.5 only.
Agreed as far as my first point is concerned. I will send another
e-mail about this to this ML, incorporate it in the second defect
report from Japan, and wait for two months.
However, I would argue that my other points are very relevant to the
subject of this technical corrigenda.
First, the correction to 17.5 appears to try to address #70 in the
Japanese defect report.
> 70. The last para of 17.5
>
> All other kinds of IRI references, namely the ones that start with a
> protocol (like http:), an authority (i.e., //) or an absolute-path
> (i.e., /) do not need any special processing. This especially means that
> absolute-paths do not reference files inside the package, but within
> the hierarchy the package is contained in, for instance the file system.
> IRI references inside a package may leave the package, but once they
> have left the package, they never can return into the package or
> another one.
>
> First, an absolute IRI reference begins with a scheme (rather than protocol),
> and it does not start with an authority or an absolute-path.
This point has not been addressed, since the corrected wording still
allows IRI references to start with an absolute-path. I believe that
best way to address it is to rely on RFCs 3986 and 3987 wihout trying to
normatively summarize what is specified there. Less is more. Therefore,
I would argue that my second and third points are very relevant to #70 in N0942.
Second, the correction to 15.31.4 appears to try to address #79 in the
Japanese defect report.
> 79. Attribute names in 15.31.4 "Tick Marks"
>
> Two attributes (chart:axis-interval-major and
> chart:axis-interval-minor) appear in the body text, while four
> different attributes, (chart:tick-marks-major-inner,
> chart:tick-marks-major-outer, chart:tick-marks-minor-inner, and
> chart:tick-marks-minor-outer) appear in the schema.
This original comment did question the attribute name "chart:axis-interval-major".
I am merely reforumating my original comment, which has not been
addressed yet.
Cheers,
--
MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) <>
