Murata-san,
Speaking strictly for myself I have a quick answer to your last comment:
MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) wrote:
<snip>
> (6) Rejected comment
>
> I do not agree on the following disposition.
>
> N0942:30 "In 15.4.1, subsection 8.8.4 of XSL is referenced, but
> it should be 7.8.4."
> Rejected, the text is correct.
>
> I still believe that 7.8.4 is correct.
>
>
Well, the comment should have read:
"In 15.4.1, subsection 8.8.4 of XSL is referenced, but it should be 7.8.8."
Our response to that comment (not the comment that was made) would have
to be:
"Accepted."
In XSL version 1.0, the font-variant attribute being found in 7.8.8.
In ODF 1.0, second edition, the font-variant attribute is found in 15.4.1.
I am not sure how we all overlooked that one so would appreciate your
checking XSL 1.0 and verifying my citation of section 7.8.8. (noting for
completeness sake that 7.8.4 is font-size, a related but distinct concept.)
Hope you are having a great weekend!
Patrick
--
Patrick Durusau
Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34
Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps)
Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300
Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)
