Correction: was Re: [office-comment] Comments on Errata 01 (CommitteeDraft 03)

Murata-san,

A correction to a comment in my post on 15.3.4:

<snip>
> 4) Correction to 15.31.4
>
> The editing instruction does not touch the first, second, and third
> sentences but merely replaces the rest of the paragraph.  However, the
> second and third sentences look unnecessary.  Even the first one can 
> be removed.
>
>   

I replied in part:

> However, correction of that oversight matters more than stylistic 
> niceties that would be observed in a complete re-drafting. I do 
> appreciate such insights but as you well know, such polishing is like 
> pulling a thread that leads to another thread and then to another. 
> However satisfying that may be, our public corrections to text to be 
> in response to the corrections requested, not as licenses to correct 
> all offenses against good style that may or may not appear in a text. 
The final sentence should read:

However satisfying that may be, our public *expects* corrections to 
text*s* to be in response to the corrections requested, not as licenses 
to correct all offenses against good style that may or may not appear in 
a text.

Hope you are having a great weekend!

Patrick

-- 
Patrick Durusau

Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34
Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps)
Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300
Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)