>
> > ISO/IEC 19757-2:2008 is technically equivalent to ISO/IEC 19757-2:2003
> > + DAM1 + DCOR1. If a schema is conformant to ISO/IEC 19757-2:2003,
> > it is gurranteed to be conformant to ISO/IEC 19757-2:2008.
> >
>
> But will a schema be interpreted the same way? In other words, will a
> ISO/IEC 19757-2:2003 express identical constraints when interpreted as a
> ISO/IEC 19757-2:2008 schema? Are there any changes we would need to name?
> Doc type declaration and namespace is the same?
Yes, a schema is interpreted the same way. No namespace changes. No
syntactical differences. No changes in semantics.
> > As for the Unicode version, this is also an issue of OOXML. (I
> > submitted a defect report, since 29500 references to V5.0, which
> > is not the latest.) We need some text that allows us to reference
> > to the latest version.
> >
>
> So Unicode 5.1? (ISO/IEC 10646:2003 plus Amendments 1, 2, 3 and 4)
Well, then do we have to publish a COR when another amendment and a new
version of Unicode appears? We have to speak with ITTF about this.
Cheers,
--
MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) <>
