Michael,
Thanks!
I was looking at an older draft on my backup laptop.
Hope you are having a great day!
Patrick
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg wrote:
> On 10/08/09 15:30, Patrick Durusau wrote:
>> Jesper,
>>
>> Just for future reference, note that dateOrDateTime is defined as:
>>
>> <define name="dateOrDateTime">
>> <choice>
>> <data type="date"/>
>> <data type="dateTime"/>
>> </choice>
>> </define>
>>
>> Considering that we then define date as date and dataTime as dataTime
>> in the schema and we reference xmlschema-2 in the prose, I suspect
>> the answer is that either an xmlschema-2 data value or an xmlschema-2
>> dateTime value is acceptable.
>>
>> The term "essentially" occurs three times in the text and I will work
>> on excising that before the next posted version. Not a useful term in
>> a standard.
>
> At least for the definition of "dateOrDateTime" this is resolved
> already. The most current draft says already:
>
> A dateOrDateTime value is either an [xmlschema-2] date value, or an
> [xmlschema-2] dateTime value.
>
> Best regards
>
> Michael
>
--
Patrick Durusau
Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34
Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps)
Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300
Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)
