← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →
metadata field
Am just working on the content association bit, and wondering more about citations and a new metadata field that generalizes the already approved citation field that I talk about here: <http://wiki.oasis-open.org/office/ Associating_Metadata_with_Document_Content> How about this ... A citation: <text:field> <text:source> <meta:fieldType rdf:resource="http://opendocument.xml.org/fields/ citation"/> <meta:referent rdf:resource="info:doi/xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"/> <meta:referent rdf:resource="info:doi/yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy" cite:pages="23"/> </text:source> <text:body> <text:span>(Doe, 1999:23; Smith, 2000)</text:span> </tet:body> </text:field> John M's medical case: <text:field> <text:source> <meta:fieldType rdf:resource="http://example.net/fields/medicine/ diagnosis"/> <meta:referent rdf:resource="urn:uuid:zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz"/> </text:source> <text:body> <text:span>Dr. John diagnosis Jane Doe with X disease.</text:span> </tet:body> </text:field> Might even be able to put links or tooltips in the body span above. So idea is any extension developer can add their own special field by giving it a type with an IRI (though we'd have a standard list). That field can then be repsonsible for certain kinds of metadata. Am just thrrowing stuff at the wall here and so not sure about the details (namespaces, etc.), but I think this general approach might well be promising. Bruce
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →