Hi Daniel
My comments.
1a.
Can someone describe the difference between text and text-global?
Do we want a office:image genre that contains just a draw:image? While
this can be done by putting a single draw:image under office:drawing it
is often interesting and valuable to differentiate between a drawing and
a single image as early as possible when processing a document.
1b.
I think so
2.
Under office:spreadsheet seems correct.
-Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Vogelheim [mailto:]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 12:16 PM
To:
Subject: [office] Clarifications
Hello all,
I'm in the process of creating a specification document conforming to
OASIS rules, and putting in last meeting's changes while I'm at it. Some
question came up:
1) 'genre' elements
We agreed to put in 'genre' elements for different document types. Two
issues:
1a) How are they named?
So far, I've just used the office:class attribute names (text,
text-global, drawing, presentation, spreadsheet, chart) with an office
namespace.
1b) office:class attribute obsoleted?
Do I assume correctly that this would obsolete the office:class
attribute?
2) <office:body> attribute
The current <office:body> element has a table:structure-protected
attribute. IIRC, this is meant for spreadsheet documents, so I assume
this would be moved to the spreadsheet 'genre' element, or even
elsewhere.
3) <office:settings> optional?
All first level elements are optional except for the <office:body>
element. The idea is: No body -> no document, and all else is optional!
For some reason, the <office:settings> element as child of the
<office:document-settings> element was made mandatory. I guess this was
just an oversight in the original definition, and should get fixed.
Any comments or disagreements?
Sincerely,
Daniel
