On Wednesday 04 June 2003 18:31, Philip Boutros wrote:
> Hi
>
> The current specification mixes the definition of a frame and its
> attributes (position, size, border, etc.) and the definition of it's
> contents. I believe the correct way to modify the specification is to
> add an explicit office:frame (or draw:frame) element and move all the
> "frame" attributes up to it. It's contents then become 1..n of the
> existing "frame" elements
> (text-box,image,applet,plugin,object,object-ole) minus all the frame
> attributes. The order of these elements under the office:frame element
> dictates the applications preference for use with the first child being
> the most preferred.
I like this proposal very much.
(I would even favour office:frame over draw:frame, but this doesn't matter much).
--
David FAURE, , sponsored by Trolltech to work on KDE,
Konqueror (http://www.konqueror.org), and KOffice (http://www.koffice.org).
Qtella users - stability patches at http://blackie.dk/~dfaure/qtella.html
